Singapore Journal of Legal Studies NUS
   
 
SEARCH  ARCHIVE
Browse/Advanced Search
 
Home
Welcome to The Singapore Journal of Legal Studies. The Journal is the flagship law journal of the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore and one of the oldest law journals in the Commonwealth. As the first and leading legal journal in Singapore, it contains a rich store of legal literature analysing the legal, political and social development of Singapore in its progression from a developing to a First World nation. The journal continues to advance the boundaries of global and local developments in law, policy and legal practice by publishing cogent and timely articles, legislation comments and case notes on a biannual basis.

Highlights of our current issue …

The journal is pleased to present its December 2008 issue, which contains articles discussing significant legal developments in Singapore and beyond. Firstly, the Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR) celebrated its 60th anniversary in 2008. While Singapore is well known for propounding the "Asian values" school of law and development in challenging the universal claims of human rights law espoused by western liberal democracies, high-ranking government officials like Attorney-General Walter Woon have affirmed that Singapore endorses the UDHR. Increasingly, UDHR standards are being cited before domestic courts, including before Singapore courts. Professor Thio Li-ann in Reading Rights Rightly: The UDHR and its Creeping Influence on the Development of Singapore Public Law  analyses the use of UDHR standards in advancing public law arguments and considers the Singapore judicial approach towards receiving and applying international human rights law.
 
Secondly, in relation to the defence of insanity, Professor Stanley Yeo in The Insanity Defence in the Criminal Laws of the Commonwealth of Nations discusses a best possible provision on this defence which compares the M'Naghten Rules and its variations in certain Commonwealth jurisdictions, as well as in practice of the International Criminal Court.
 
Thirdly, Assistant Professor Yvonne Lee in "Don't Ever Take a Fence Down Until You Know the Reason It Was Put Up"—Singapore Communitarianism and the Case for Conserving 377A analyses the Penal Code debate in relation to section 377A which criminalises acts of gross indecency between male adults. This matter was thoroughly debated providing fiercely divergent views within academia, civil society and the Law Society. Singapore is probably the only country in the world to have fully debated this politically contentious issue and deliberately decided to retain the law which criminalises homosexual acts.
 
Fourthly, following recent cases from the U.K. and Singapore, Associate Professor Margaret Fordham in Sexual Abuse and the Limitation of Actions in Tort—A Case for Greater Flexibility? examines the adverse consequences flowing out of Singapore's more rigid approach to the limitation of actions, particularly in cases of sexual abuses.
 
The current issue also features two papers which were presented at the fourth biennial Obligations Conference, Goals of Private Law, hosted by the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore, together with the Singapore Academy of Law and the University of Melbourne. These are Equity, Obligations and Third Parties and The Iniquity of Equity: A Home-Sharer's Tale by Reader in Property Law Ben MacFarlane and Senior Lecturer Simone Wong respectively.
 
 The journal may be cited as Sing. J.L.S.

 

 

 

 

sjls lcolumn sjls lcolumn sjls rcolumn sjls rcolumn sjls rcolumn