On 3 September 2020, the Asian Principles for the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments (hereinafter, "Asian Principles") adopted under the auspices of the Asian Business Law Institute was officially released, a date that may be considered a turning point in the history of legal developments in the field of recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Asia. This is because to date, there is no single regional framework that ensures the smooth circulation of judgments between neighbouring states despite strong economic ties that bind the various Asian jurisdictions. Many of these states (such as Indonesia, Japan, the Philippines, South Korea, Thailand etc.) have not even showed eagerness to establish their own networks of bilateral cooperation to that effect (for an earlier unfruitful attempt, see Asian-African Legal Consultative Committee, Report of the Seventh Session Baghdad 1965 (1966)). This status quo might intrigue outsiders' curiosity. Indeed, unlike Europe, Latin America,_x000D_ or intergovernmental organisations such as the Commonwealth of Independent_x000D_ States ("CIS"), the League of Arab States ("LAS") or the Gulf Cooperation Council_x000D_ ("GCC"), where regional schemes on judgments recognition and enforcement have_x000D_ already been in place, the lack of interest displayed in some parts of Asia, at least at_x000D_ an official or diplomatic level, is hardly comprehensible. This is more so knowing_x000D_ that the field of international arbitration has a completely different picture although_x000D_ the need to foster economic growth and to guarantee legal certainty and predictability_x000D_ is indifferent to which method of dispute resolution is adopted.

Causation in the tort of negligence is a "legal minefield" that any philosopher, scientist or lawyer is to tread "with trepidation" (at p 1). To deal with causation, courts have developed an array of tests with seemingly no coherence. Should courts apply the 'doubling the risk' test or reverse the burden of proof? Or should the Fairchild exception apply? In Causation in Negligence, Sarah Green ambitiously proposes an analytical framework that "eschews detailed philosophical and theoretical handwringing in favour of pragmatic reasoning" (at p 1). Green claims that her framework, which she calls the Necessary Breach Analysis ("NBA"), provides an accessible way to approaching causal problems.