{"id":34273,"date":"2024-07-18T05:58:57","date_gmt":"2024-07-18T05:58:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/?page_id=34273"},"modified":"2025-05-21T07:53:12","modified_gmt":"2025-05-21T07:53:12","slug":"home-page","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/","title":{"rendered":"Home page"},"content":{"rendered":"\n\n\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2024\/07\/SJLS-logo-2.png\" alt=\"SJLS-logo-2\" itemprop=\"image\" title=\"SJLS-logo-2\" onerror=\"this.style.display='none'\"  \/>\n<h2>\n\t\tSINGAPORE JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES\n\t<\/h2>\n\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2022\/06\/SJLS-2019-Cover-191x300.jpg\" alt=\"SJLS 2019 Cover\" itemprop=\"image\" title=\"SJLS 2019 Cover\" onerror=\"this.style.display='none'\"  \/>\n\t<strong>ISSN<\/strong>: 0218-2173 (Print)<br \/>\n<strong>ISSN<\/strong>: 3029-1216 (Digital\/Websites)\n<p>The Singapore Journal of Legal Studies is an open access journal on a CC BY-NC-ND basis. See further: <a href=\"https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/cclicenses\/\">https:\/\/creativecommons.org\/share-your-work\/cclicenses\/<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Selected articles and notes published by the journal are available as podcasts which have been generated using AI tools.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Editors<\/strong>: Sandra Annette BOOYSEN <i>National University of Singapore <\/i>and Christian WITTING <i>National University of Singapore<\/i><\/p>\n<p>The <em>Singapore Journal of Legal Studies<\/em> has been in continuous publication since 1959 when it first appeared as the University of Malaya Law Review. Institutional changes made it necessary for the Journal to be re-named twice, first as the <em>Malaya Law Review<\/em> and then the <em>Singapore Journal of Legal Studies<\/em>. Together with its predecessor journals (the <em>University of Malaya Law Review<\/em> and the <em>Malaya Law Review<\/em>), the Journal is one of the oldest legal journals in the British Commonwealth. As the first and leading legal journal in Singapore, it has witnessed the legal, political and social development of Singapore as it progressed from being a Third World country to a First World country. The Journal has traced the development of common law in Asia, particularly, Singapore and Malaysia.<a href=\"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/about-us\/overview\/\"> &gt;&gt; Read More<\/a><\/p>\n<h2>\n\t\tFeatured Content\n\t<\/h2>\n\t<div class=\"ws-journal-featured-container \"><ul class=\"ws-journal-featured\"><li><div class=\"ws-journal-content\"><div class=\"content-container\"><div class=\"content-type\"><span class=\"content-type-link\">Article<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-title\"><h3>Special Feature: Intellectual Property and Technology in the 21st Century: Part 1 &#8211; Preface<\/h3><\/div><div class=\"content-authors\"><span class=\"content-author-text\">David Tan<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-citation\"><span class=\"content-citation-text\">[2026] Sing JLS 1-4<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-first-view\"><span class=\"content-first-view-text\">First view: [Mar 2026 Online] Sing JLS 1-4<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-abstract\">In August 2025, two research centres from the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore \u2013 the Centre for Technology, Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & the Law (\u201cT<span class=\"hidden-abstract\">RAIL\u201d) and the EW Barker Centre for Law & Business \u2013 partnered with research centres from Columbia, Oxford and Tsinghua to co\u2011organise a truly transnational two\u2011day conference marking the first\u2011ever academic collaboration of its kind across these leading global institutions. Titled \u201cIntellectual Property and Technology in the 21st Century: Challenges in the Next Decade\u201d, the conference discussed how intellectual property (\u201cIP\u201d) laws can better deal with disruptive technology trends. The conference was also supported by partners such as Google, ByteDance, the Singapore Academy of Law and the Intellectual Property Office of Singapore (\u201cIPOS\u201d).<\/span> <a href=\"#\" class=\"abstract-more\">...Read more<\/a> <a href=\"#\" class=\"abstract-hide\">Show less<\/a><\/div><div class=\"content-pdf\"><a class=\"button-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2025\/10\/sjls_mar_2026_1.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"button-pdf-icon\"><\/span> PDF<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/li><li><div class=\"ws-journal-content\"><div class=\"content-container\"><div class=\"content-type\"><span class=\"content-type-link\">Article<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-title\"><h3>Special Feature: Intellectual Property and Technology in the 21st Century: Part 1 &#8211; Introduction<\/h3><\/div><div class=\"content-authors\"><span class=\"content-author-text\">Daren Tang<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-citation\"><span class=\"content-citation-text\">[2026] Sing JLS 5-10<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-first-view\"><span class=\"content-first-view-text\">First view: [Mar 2026 Online] Sing JLS 1-6<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-abstract\">One of the biggest lessons I learnt in law school was that the law never happens in a vacuum, and in these times of geopolitical tension, economic uncertainty, societal stress<span class=\"hidden-abstract\"> and technological acceleration, context matters more than ever. Therefore, I hope in this keynote to provide some context to the discussions that will take place over the next two days.<\/span> <a href=\"#\" class=\"abstract-more\">...Read more<\/a> <a href=\"#\" class=\"abstract-hide\">Show less<\/a><\/div><div class=\"content-pdf\"><a class=\"button-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2025\/10\/sjls_mar_2026_5.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"button-pdf-icon\"><\/span> PDF<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"ws-journal-featured\"><li><div class=\"ws-journal-content\"><div class=\"content-container\"><div class=\"content-type\"><span class=\"content-type-link\">Article<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-title\"><h3>Special Feature: Intellectual Property and Technology in the 21st Century: Part 1 &#8211; The Surprising Virtues of Heterogeneity: Legal Pluralism and the Governance of Generative AI\u2002<\/h3><\/div><div class=\"content-authors\"><span class=\"content-author-text\">Daryl Lim<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-citation\"><span class=\"content-citation-text\">[2026] Sing JLS 11-45<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-first-view\"><span class=\"content-first-view-text\">First view: [Mar 2026 Online] Sing JLS 1-35<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-abstract\">This Article argues that the United States\u2019 fragmented approach to generative AI regulation is a strategic strength rather than a flaw. In place of a single federal regime, <span class=\"hidden-abstract\">privacy law, the right of publicity, and copyright offer overlapping tools to address identity-linked harms, each grounded in distinct theories of harm and institutional traditions. This pluralism promotes experimentation, learning, and well-reasoned development rather than confusion. Heterogeneous governance helps courts and lawmakers adapt incrementally to fast-moving technologies, avoid premature lock-in, and coordinate protections across legal silos. To build on these advantages, the Article proposes a narrowly tailored data right focused on high-fidelity, identity-linked uses of data. Functioning as an opt-in, transparency-driven supplement to existing doctrines, this right would close gaps while preserving innovation and doctrinal diversity. The result is a principled, pragmatic approach that safeguards individual agency and leverages the adaptive strengths of US federalism.<\/span> <a href=\"#\" class=\"abstract-more\">...Read more<\/a> <a href=\"#\" class=\"abstract-hide\">Show less<\/a><\/div><div class=\"content-pdf\"><a class=\"button-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2025\/10\/sjls_mar_2026_11.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"button-pdf-icon\"><\/span> PDF<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/li><li><div class=\"ws-journal-content\"><div class=\"content-container\"><div class=\"content-type\"><span class=\"content-type-link\">Article<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-title\"><h3>Special Feature: Intellectual Property and Technology in the 21st Century: Part 1 &#8211; Vocal Identity Under Siege by AI Voice Cloning Technologies<\/h3><\/div><div class=\"content-authors\"><span class=\"content-author-text\">Jyn-An Lee<\/span> <span class=\"content-author-text\">Xuan Sun<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-citation\"><span class=\"content-citation-text\">[2026] Sing JLS 46-76<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-first-view\"><span class=\"content-first-view-text\">First view: [Mar 2026 Online] Sing JLS 1-31<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-abstract\">The advent of sophisticated AI-driven voice cloning has brought to the fore critical legal and ethical challenges regarding the protection of vocal identity. Prompted by recen<span class=\"hidden-abstract\">t controversies \u2013 including the striking resemblance between OpenAI\u2019s ChatGPT-4o voice and that of Scarlett Johansson \u2013 this article examines how generative AI technologies undermine the unique value of the human voice and further complicate the legal questions surrounding personal identity. Through a comparative analysis, the paper evaluates three principal legal frameworks: the right of publicity, personality rights, and the personal data protection right. Each framework \u2013 rooted in different legal traditions \u2013 offers distinct strengths and limitations in addressing the threats posed by AI-generated voice cloning. By analysing these doctrines\u2019 scope, remedies, and posthumous protections, the study offers a foundation for understanding how existing legal approaches may be applied to the evolving challenges of vocal identity in the era of generative AI.<\/span> <a href=\"#\" class=\"abstract-more\">...Read more<\/a> <a href=\"#\" class=\"abstract-hide\">Show less<\/a><\/div><div class=\"content-pdf\"><a class=\"button-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2025\/10\/sjls_mar_2026_46.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"button-pdf-icon\"><\/span> PDF<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"ws-journal-featured\"><li><div class=\"ws-journal-content\"><div class=\"content-container\"><div class=\"content-type\"><span class=\"content-type-link\">Article<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-title\"><h3>Special Feature: Intellectual Property and Technology in the 21st Century: Part 1 &#8211; Three Obstacles to AI-Generated Content Copyrightability<\/h3><\/div><div class=\"content-authors\"><span class=\"content-author-text\">Tianxiang He<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-citation\"><span class=\"content-citation-text\">[2026] Sing JLS 77-106<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-first-view\"><span class=\"content-first-view-text\">First view: [Mar 2026 Online] Sing JLS 1-30<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-abstract\">Prompt-based AI creativity is redefining how expressive works are produced, posing novel challenges for copyright law. This article identifies three major obstacles standing i<span class=\"hidden-abstract\">n the way of AI copyrightability. First, the lack of meaningful human control in prompt-based AI creation undercuts the traditional requirement of human authorship. The cross-categorical nature of generative AI outputs also exposes a fundamental mismatch with copyright\u2019s theoretical design. Second, recognising copyright in machine-created outputs risks creating unjustified windfalls for users who claim authorship without true creative contribution, undermining copyright\u2019s incentive structure. Third, protecting AI outputs under copyright without distinction has broader creative and social consequences, including cognitive offloading, reduced authenticity, and stagnation in artistic diversity, which could erode the value of human creativity. This article recommends that future regulation preserve human-centred authorship in copyright law, implement transparency mechanisms for AI-assisted creations, and avoid overextending copyright in ways that erode the value of human creativity.<\/span> <a href=\"#\" class=\"abstract-more\">...Read more<\/a> <a href=\"#\" class=\"abstract-hide\">Show less<\/a><\/div><div class=\"content-pdf\"><a class=\"button-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2025\/10\/sjls_mar_2026_77.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"button-pdf-icon\"><\/span> PDF<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/li><li><div class=\"ws-journal-content\"><div class=\"content-container\"><div class=\"content-type\"><span class=\"content-type-link\">Article<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-title\"><h3>Special Feature: Intellectual Property and Technology in the 21st Century: Part 1 &#8211; Against Trade Secrets Protection for \u201cSemi-Public\u201d Databases<\/h3><\/div><div class=\"content-authors\"><span class=\"content-author-text\">Yang Chen<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-citation\"><span class=\"content-citation-text\">[2026] Sing JLS 107-128<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-first-view\"><span class=\"content-first-view-text\">First view: [Mar 2026 Online] Sing JLS 1-22<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-abstract\">This article examines whether trade secrets law should be applied to protect \u201csemi-public\u201d databases with frontend data access that is open to the public. It argues that t<span class=\"hidden-abstract\">he incentive-based justification, whether grounded in the traditional rationale or reframed through an investment lens, does not provide a compelling basis for extending protection. The business efficiency rationale may arguably support trade secrets protection only where frontend access is restricted to a clearly defined and limited group of users. By contrast, when access is open to an indefinite public, ambiguous legal standards fail to mitigate inefficiencies and may even intensify the technological arms race between data holders and scrapers. Although deterrence could theoretically yield efficiency benefits, such an effect rests on a flawed assumption and risks suppressing activities that serve the public interest. Moreover, given the powerful and arguably overprotective alternatives already available to database holders, introducing trade secrets protection in this context risks further distorting the balance between private and public interests.<\/span> <a href=\"#\" class=\"abstract-more\">...Read more<\/a> <a href=\"#\" class=\"abstract-hide\">Show less<\/a><\/div><div class=\"content-pdf\"><a class=\"button-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2025\/10\/sjls_mar_2026_107.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"button-pdf-icon\"><\/span> PDF<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/li><\/ul><ul class=\"ws-journal-featured\"><li><div class=\"ws-journal-content\"><div class=\"content-container\"><div class=\"content-type\"><span class=\"content-type-link\">Article<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-title\"><h3>Closing the Gap: A Timely Call for Singapore to Consider Regulating Inside Information in Sports Betting<\/h3><\/div><div class=\"content-authors\"><span class=\"content-author-text\">Jun Ming Mervyn Cheong<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-citation\"><span class=\"content-citation-text\">[2026] Sing JLS 129-156<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-first-view\"><span class=\"content-first-view-text\">First view: [Mar 2026 Online] Sing JLS 1-28<\/span><\/div><div class=\"content-abstract\">Although Singapore has legalised sports betting since 1999 and the sector involves billions of dollars, it lacks specific legislation regulating the misuse of inside informati<span class=\"hidden-abstract\">on in sports betting, one of the two most common forms of match manipulation observed internationally and a recognised money laundering risk. This regulatory gap could be exploited, especially as developments in other jurisdictions reveal emerging legal and policy challenges that Singapore\u2019s existing anti-corruption laws cannot fully address. These implications remain unexamined in the Singapore context and this article seeks to fill that gap by examining these challenges, identifying existing regulatory approaches, and proposing a Hybrid Information-Connected Approach, inspired by Singapore\u2019s financial insider trading laws, for Singapore to consider adopting. By identifying and defining this hybrid approach, this article aims to contribute a framework for future regulatory development in sports betting and support Singapore\u2019s efforts to uphold sports integrity and strengthen its anti-money laundering regime.<\/span> <a href=\"#\" class=\"abstract-more\">...Read more<\/a> <a href=\"#\" class=\"abstract-hide\">Show less<\/a><\/div><div class=\"content-pdf\"><a class=\"button-pdf-link\" href=\"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2025\/10\/sjls_mar_2026_129.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><span class=\"button-pdf-icon\"><\/span> PDF<\/a><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/li><\/ul><\/div>\n<h2>\n\t\tThe journal can also be accessed electronically through the following channels:\n\t<\/h2>\n\t\t\t\t<a href=\"http:\/\/www.lawnet.com.sg\/\" target=\"_self\" itemprop=\"url\" rel=\"noopener\">\n\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2022\/04\/LawNet-1.png\" alt=\"LawNet\" itemprop=\"image\" title=\"LawNet\" onerror=\"this.style.display='none'\"  \/>\n\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.westlawasia.com\/\" target=\"_self\" itemprop=\"url\" rel=\"noopener\">\n\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2022\/01\/Westlaw_asia.png\" alt=\"Westlaw_asia\" itemprop=\"image\" title=\"Westlaw_asia\" onerror=\"this.style.display='none'\"  \/>\n\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/home.heinonline.org\/\" target=\"_self\" itemprop=\"url\" rel=\"noopener\">\n\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2022\/01\/heinonline.png\" alt=\"heinonline\" itemprop=\"image\" title=\"heinonline\" onerror=\"this.style.display='none'\"  \/>\n\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<a href=\"http:\/\/www.hwwilson.com\/\" target=\"_self\" itemprop=\"url\" rel=\"noopener\">\n\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2022\/01\/wilson.png\" alt=\"wilson\" itemprop=\"image\" title=\"wilson\" onerror=\"this.style.display='none'\"  \/>\n\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/search.informit.org\/\" target=\"_self\" itemprop=\"url\" rel=\"noopener\">\n\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2022\/01\/informit.png\" alt=\"informit\" itemprop=\"image\" title=\"informit\" onerror=\"this.style.display='none'\"  \/>\n\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/papers.ssrn.com\/sol3\/JELJOUR_Results.cfm?form_name=journalBrowse&#038;journal_id=310500\" target=\"_self\" itemprop=\"url\" rel=\"noopener\">\n\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2022\/01\/ssrn.png\" alt=\"ssrn\" itemprop=\"image\" title=\"ssrn\" onerror=\"this.style.display='none'\"  \/>\n\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\t\t\t\t<a href=\"https:\/\/www.proquest.com\/\" target=\"_self\" itemprop=\"url\" rel=\"noopener\">\n\t\t\t\t<img decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/14\/2022\/05\/proquest.jpg\" alt=\"proquest\" itemprop=\"image\" title=\"proquest\" onerror=\"this.style.display='none'\"  \/>\n\t\t\t\t<\/a>\n\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"site-sidebar-layout":"no-sidebar","site-content-layout":"page-builder","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"disabled","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"disabled","footer-sml-layout":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"set","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-34273","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/34273"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=34273"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/34273\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":34886,"href":"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/34273\/revisions\/34886"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/law.nus.edu.sg\/sjls\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=34273"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}