SINGAPORE JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES
Search Result
- Case and Legislation Notes
What’s in a Name? – The “Off with the Label” Doctrine in The Law of Landlord and Tenant
Citation: [1960] Sing JLS 335 - Case and Legislation Notes
Winding-Up of a Foreign Company on the Just and Equitable Ground
Citation: [2016] Sing JLS 336Yung Kee Restaurant on Wellington Street in Hong Kong is justly famous for the delicious goose it serves to hungry diners beating a path to its doors. In Re Yung Kee Holdings Ltd (CFA), the family which founded Yung Kee Restaurant and has operated the restaurant for three generations served up a seminal case involving how a court should approach a petition to wind up an unregistered foreign company on the just and equitable ground. Petitions to wind up such foreign companies tend to be creditor petitions on the ground that a company has not been able to pay its debts. Yung Kee Holdings Ltd ("the Company") was an ultimate holding company, and was incorporated in the British Virgin Islands ("BVI"). The famous restaurant, various properties and other business interests were held by Hong Kong entities, and were indirectly held by the subject company through another intermediary BVI company, Long Yau Ltd. In granting the petition to wind up the Company, the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal signed the order for the present restaurateurs to sing their swan song. - Case and Legislation Notes
Contract – Remotness of Damage: Koufos v C. Czarnikow Ltd.
Citation: [1968] Sing JLS 336 - Case and Legislation Notes
Home Sharing – Intention to create Legal Relations
Citation: [1960] Sing JLS 338 - Case and Legislation Notes
Specific Performance of Contract in Favour of Stranger: Beswick v Beswick
Citation: [1967] Sing JLS 339 - Case and Legislation Notes
Capital Murder – Natural Consequences – Rejection of Subjective Test
Citation: [1960] Sing JLS 340 - Case and Legislation Notes
Federalism and Indigenous Peoples in Sarawak: The Malaysian Federal Court’s Judgments in Sandah (No 1) and (No 2)
Citation: [2020] Sing JLS 341Legal recognition of indigenous land rights for the indigenous peoples in the Malaysian state of Sarawak is still in an unfortunate state. Despite being the largest ethnic group of the state and enjoying benefits under the federal system, the fight to hold onto their traditional customs is far from over. The recent Malaysia Federal Court rulings in Sandah (No 1) and (No 2) illustrated this point as the court denied their native customary rights on their ancestral land and also their rights to have their case heard by at least one judge with Bornean judicial experience. With no clear law to shed light on the legal existence of their traditional customs as well as the Constitution's silence on the requirement to have at least one judge with Bornean judicial experience, the Federal Court's endeavour to resolve these issues merits attention. This paper thus reviews and comments on the decisions of the Federal Court, with special focus on the implications for the federal system. - Case and Legislation Notes
Requirement of a Pre-Existing Interest to Support a Caveat under the Land Titles Act The Asiatic Enterprises (Pte) Ltd v United Overseas Bank Ltd
Citation: [2000] Sing JLS 341
