SJLS-logo-2

SINGAPORE JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES

transparent
transparent

  • Journal Result

  • Book Review

    Book Review: Case Analysis and Statutory Interpretation – Cases and Materials by Robert C Beckman, Brady S Coleman and Joel Lee

    Citation: [2001] Sing JLS 538
  • Book Review

    Book Review: Bankruptcy Law in Malaysia and Singapore by GK Ganesan

    Citation: [2001] Sing JLS 540
  • Book Review

    Book Review: Torts Tomorrow – A Tribute to John Fleming by Nicholas J Mullany and Allen M Linden (eds)

    Citation: [2001] Sing JLS 541
  • Book Review

    Book Review: Annotated Insurance Contracts Act by Peter Mann

    Citation: [2001] Sing JLS 544
  • Book Review

    Book Review: The Maltese Constitution and Constitutional History Since 1813 by JJ Cremona

    Citation: [1994] Sing JLS 547
  • Book Review

    Book Review: The Law of Cross-Border Securities Transactions by Hans van Houtte (ed)

    Citation: [2001] Sing JLS 548
  • Book Review

    Book Review: Obtaining Security in Maritime Cases – A Survey of Pacific Rim Jurisdictions

    Citation: [1994] Sing JLS 551
  • Book Review

    Book Review: Civil Procedure by Jeffrey Pinsler

    Citation: [1994] Sing JLS 552
  • Book Review

    Book Review: The Sources of Hong Kong by Peter Wesley-Smith

    Citation: [1994] Sing JLS 553
  • Book Review

    Book Review: Codification, Macaulay and the Indian Penal Code: The Legacies and Modern Challenges of Criminal Law Reform by Wing-Cheong Chan, Barry Wright and Stanley Yeo, eds.

    Citation: [2011] Sing JLS 581
    As noted (at p. vii) by the contributors to this book, the Indian Penal Code 1860 (Central Act 45 of 1860) ("IPC"), largely the work of Thomas Macaulay, "was the first codification of criminal law in the British Empire and is the longest serving code in the common law world". Upon its enactment, the influential IPC was adopted in various British colonies, such as Singapore. The continuing use of legislation of such pedigree, however, brings about several problems. Any legislative inertia to update the statute from time to time will put the judiciary in a dilemma, whenever the latter is asked to either resolve newfound ambiguities and loopholes in the pro-visions, or interpret provisions in the context of evolving social norms. Lacking a democratic mandate, different judges will also have different conceptions of how much judicial activism can and should be accommodated.